GECCO 2002 REVIEWER REVIEW FORM

The purpose of this form is to give authors the opportunity to comment 
on the quality of the reviews they received for their submissions 
to GECCO 2002. 
The comments provided in this form will be NOT be used to modify 
the outcome of the review process. They will be mainly used to 
decide whether the reviewers did or did not do a good job and, 
consequently, if they should or should not be considered for
future GECCO's. 

An author's comments will not be passed to the reviewers unless the author 
explicitly agrees. 
Should you wish to comment on your reviews, Email one completed form for each 
submission to the chair of the deme or special track that delt with 
the submission by 5 April. 
 

GECCO 2002 REVIEWER REVIEW FORM

PAPER TITLE AND REFERENCE NUMBER
   (please use separate forms if multiple papers were submitted) 

AUTHORS:
   (this field will be removed if this form is passed to the reviewer)

FINAL OUTCOME: (please delete all but one) 
     talk
     poster
     rejected

REVIEWER NUMBER:
   (please send one form per reviewer)

COMPLETENESS OF YOUR GECCO 2002 REVIEWS:
Compared to other conferences, what is your rating of the completeness
of the GECCO 2002 review documents that you received from the reviewers
(please, delete all but one answer):

___ significantly more detailed and extensive
___ somewhat more detailed and extensive
___ about the same
___ somewhat less detailed and extensive
___ significantly less detailed and extensive
___ no opinion


HELPFULNESS OF YOUR GECCO REVIEWS:
Compared to other conferences, what is your rating of the helpfulness
and usefulness of the GECCO review documents that you received:
(please, delete all but one answer): 

___ significantly more helpful
___ somewhat more helpful
___ about the same
___ somewhat less helpful
___ significantly less helpful
___ no opinion


OVERALL OPINION OF YOUR GECCO REVIEWS:
Compared to other conferences, what is your rating of the overall
quality of the GECCO review documents that you received: 
(please, delete all but one answer):

___ significantly better
___ somewhat better
___ about the same
___ somewhat worse
___ significantly worse
___ no opinion


ABSOLUTE RATING OF YOUR GECCO 2002 REVIEWERS: 
What is your recommendation if this reviewer volunteers to be a
reviewer for the GECCO'2003 conference:

4 = definitely accept
3 = probably accept
2 = uncertain
1 = probably reject
0 = definitely reject


DO YOU WANT THIS FORM (ANONYMISED) TO BE PASSED TO THE REVIEWER?
(please delete as appropriate)

   yes
   no


COMMENTS FOR CO-CHAIRS ONLY: 
      (these will be removed if this form is passed to the reviewer)